No, it's FLAWED, but I very much enjoyed it from start to end, even with all the hickups. Yet I kept watching bc it wasn't all complete nonsense and it made me think about things I otherwise wouldn't have. I believe a lot of what this show tried to do post-ep7 was too convaluted to work. It's the entire no black without white and vise-versa schtik. One could argue that continuing evil is a bad thing and therefore the is all nonsense - but said evil is needed to even know what is "good". I think the message the last episode tried to send, while still very flawed, was way better than what they did in Ep11. To convey this message to the world Zen killed himself to make himself look like the exact opposite - "the coward who killed a good person and then ended his own life." - He knows the world saw him as a bad person now, and if a bad person - an enemy of what's good - like him commits suicide, it sets a bad example for the pro-suicide people. The president was seen as good bc he wanted to continue to think about it. Magase only confirmed his solution to the question of good and evil. Zen did NOT kill himself bc Magase told him so. To prevent this he wanted Zen to kill him first, so this message isn't being spread. Had Alex killed himself right after his speech, it would send the message that this is his final answer to the matter out to the entire world. In my opinion - this is what the ending was trying to convey: (Keep in mind I am only explaining the gist of it, I still think it's a big stretch, but I fully believe this was the intention) I see a lot of hatred for the ending here but also a LOT of wrong "conclusions" people came to.